Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 11:45

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
50 Cent Pledges to Prevent a Trump Pardon for Sean Combs: ‘I’m Gonna Reach Out’ - Rolling Stone
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
BlackRock removed from Texas blacklist after climate policy rollback - Financial Times
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
What are some key features of Google Gemini 2.0?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Scientists discover universal rule that governs all life on Earth - The Brighter Side of News
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Switch, Xbox, and the portable future of games - The Verge
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Samsung is struggling to sell the Galaxy S25 Edge - SamMobile
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump signs proclamation banning travel from 12 countries - ABC News